Holly commented on Russell's question: “*If they are found to be a genuine refugee”
Holly commented on Russell's question: “Also, it is important to note that asylum seekers are not 'illegal immigrants'. Illegal immigrants are those who do not meet legal requirements for entry into a country; however, under international law, everyone (including you or me) can legally enter a country if claiming asylum (see Article 14 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights). If that claim is rejected, and that person is not found to be a genuine refugee, then they are deported. If they are, they have legally entered the country. ”
Holly commented on Russell's question: “Russell, can you please quote the sources for your statistics? ie. that refugees 'receive more than double the welfare benefits of the elderly' and that 'over 80% of refugees from places like Afghanistan are still dependent on welfare'.”
Holly asked the question: “Both political parties state that their concern about 'boat people' is that they are risking their lives by 'jumping the queue'. If the humanitarian aspect (ie. protecting lives) is such an important issue to the politicians, why aren't the parties tackling the root of the problem and boosting funding for UN refugee camps to speed up processing? And furthermore, how can they then justify 'turning back the boats' or sending refugees to be processed in dangerous countries?”
Holly commented on Mark's question: “By your comment, Bob L, I would have estimated that your 'knowledge and experience' would respect science and reason - but alas, it seems not. Those of us who can appreciate scientific method recognise that it is a tool of professional sceptics, and that if you take heed of it in one context (do you listen to your GP?), that it is logical to apply that same respect to its application in other fields. Having such an understanding is not limited to certain generations, but requires the application of logic. If 'knowledge and experience' are...”
