“Why is there not a cap on the length of time one is employed under casual status in situations where you are required to work set hours and days every week, such as if you were employed part-time? It makes no sense there are so many casual employees who have worked the same job for months/years, yet are still fall under the banner of 'casual' meaning they miss out on access to sick leave and public holiday pay etc., (especially when firms close down over the Christmas break), and also aren't entitled to development opportunities of their co-workers. When the 'casual' job is a somewhat long term permanent arrangement, should employers be made to transition the position to part-time status after a given timeframe?”
Secure jobs for a better future 
Jo-Anne Rowland
Sharing is caring
People who voted for this question